The sensitivity of contingent valuation outcomes to CV survey methods

Characteristics of environmental resources and their relevance for measuring value / David J. Bjornstad and James R. Kahn — The Conceptual underpinnings of the contingent valuation method / Anthony C. Fisher — Theory versus data in the contingent valuation debate / W. Michael Hanemann — Discussion of the conceptual underpinnings of the contingent valuation method by A.C. Fisher / Peter Diamond — The Sensitivity of CV outcomes to CV survey methods / Howard Schuman — Sources of bias in contingent valuation / William Schulze … [et al.] — Evaluating CV performance: separating the light from the heat / William H. Desvousges, Sara P. Hudson, and Melissa C. Ruby — Rationality and invariance: response to Schuman / Jonathan Baron — Relating stated preference measures and models to choices in real markets: calibration of CV responses / Jordan Louviere — Relating stated and revealed preferences: challenges and opportunities / Ronald Cummings — Calibration of CV responses: discussion / Alan Randall — Estimating the demand for public goods: the collective choice and contingent valuation approaches / Wallace E. Oates — Comments on ‘Estimating the demand for public goods … ‘ / Maureen L. Cropper — Estimating the demand for public goods: comments and extensions / Perry Shapiro and Robert T. Deacon — Structuring a research agenda to estimate environmental values / David J. Bjornstad and James R. Kahn.